*Jesus **is the subject here, my child is *not the subject here.
that's the parameters you are setting,
Hopefully yes, thats the subject Jesus, religion, god, the Bible, theology in general and people's views on that subject.
I don't think I can be said to be setting any parameters because I don't recognise an attack on the person putting the view forward as valid - whilst accepting an attack on the argument as perfectly valid ?
(again, just to reiterate that this in not what Pjamamamas intended)
by making a statement that is percieved by adherents of a particular faith system as being beyond pure intellectual discourse and involves what to them is tangible and real then they will bring in a mutual reference point to exemplify what they feel they experience [ie, human relationships]
Ok, you possibly have point here, so what can I say, if it promotes someone's argument do what you think works, but I can't help thinking these kinds tangents are less relevant.
Hopefully yes, thats the subject Jesus, religion, god, the Bible, theology in general and people's views on that subject.
I don't think I can be said to be setting any parameters because I don't recognise an attack on the person putting the view forward as valid - whilst accepting an attack on the argument as perfectly valid ?
(again, just to reiterate that this in not what Pjamamamas intended)
Ok, you possibly have point here, so what can I say, if it promotes someone's argument do what you think works, but I can't help thinking these kinds tangents are less relevant.