They are a rule unto themselves, to put it bluntly
I agree.
when "They" = motorists
because 100% of the motorists I see every day break the law in one way or another.
why have speed limits and traffic laws and road markings if it's accepted that nobody heeds them?
a bit like accepting cyclists breaking reds and riding on pavements, except they don't get away with that, as we know from the countless "stings" set up all over London.
You can't have double standards, we all have a duty of care on the road, and those more likely to kill should be held responsible first and foremost.
It's ridiculous, like turning a blind eye to rape and murder whilst going balls-out to prosecute a shoplifter.
I agree.
when "They" = motorists
because 100% of the motorists I see every day break the law in one way or another.
why have speed limits and traffic laws and road markings if it's accepted that nobody heeds them?
a bit like accepting cyclists breaking reds and riding on pavements, except they don't get away with that, as we know from the countless "stings" set up all over London.
You can't have double standards, we all have a duty of care on the road, and those more likely to kill should be held responsible first and foremost.
It's ridiculous, like turning a blind eye to rape and murder whilst going balls-out to prosecute a shoplifter.