More good press

Howard was cycling on the road when he approached the group but the court heard conflicting evidence about whether he mounted the kerb at any point during the incident.

if the evidence was conflicting, then why was he found guilty? seems a bit odd, it's not much of a fine for causing a death, even if it is about 3 times more than what motorists usually get for the same thing.

sounds like a bunch of kids stepped into the road, as they will, and he stubbornly refused to take evasive action.

If that's the case then he really ought to have a prison sentence shouldn't he?

it should certainly make certain cyclist think a bit more about the way they ride around peds. I know sometime we want to kill them, but you have to accept the consequences.