that's a problem if you shoot really wide, it's not an issue for me as i have a 40mm and i don't use it that often and can always hire a 38swc (never needed to though).
those cropped dslr's are a like squinting into microscope, i know lots of people like them but i think they are horrible things to use.
for the price you paid for, a Canon 5D would've been a much better option, since it's a full-frame DSLR that finally match the 35mm counterpart while medium format digital has yet to scratch the surface for film.
£200 to hire a digital 39 megapixels back for a day? £2 for a Kodak Portra 160VC, £8 to developed and CD, or get it developed only for £5, and then get it professionally scanned at a much higher resolution for like, £15 at Metro Imaging or any other pro place, work out cheaper in the end.
you can see why I brought a Bronica medium format SLR than a Nikon D200 or Canon 20D back then, especially when it's half the price of the DSLR (£470 paid for the Bronica).
for the price you paid for, a Canon 5D would've been a much better option, since it's a full-frame DSLR that finally match the 35mm counterpart while medium format digital has yet to scratch the surface for film.
£200 to hire a digital 39 megapixels back for a day? £2 for a Kodak Portra 160VC, £8 to developed and CD, or get it developed only for £5, and then get it professionally scanned at a much higher resolution for like, £15 at Metro Imaging or any other pro place, work out cheaper in the end.
you can see why I brought a Bronica medium format SLR than a Nikon D200 or Canon 20D back then, especially when it's half the price of the DSLR (£470 paid for the Bronica).