i think it's because I first heard it used on the kind of late-night programme that was considered well racy back in the mid-90s, where some z-list celeb would anchor weekly forays into the murky world of the British sex life. I think the idea was we were still clueless when it came to modern methods of sexual abandon and so new and daring bonk-enhancers were discussed, like edible underpants. Anyway, when it came to the step-by-step technique demystifiers, they always recommended we should use "plenty of lube". The "plenty" bit had me cringing almost as much as the "lube" bit for some reason.
i think it's because I first heard it used on the kind of late-night programme that was considered well racy back in the mid-90s, where some z-list celeb would anchor weekly forays into the murky world of the British sex life. I think the idea was we were still clueless when it came to modern methods of sexual abandon and so new and daring bonk-enhancers were discussed, like edible underpants. Anyway, when it came to the step-by-step technique demystifiers, they always recommended we should use "plenty of lube". The "plenty" bit had me cringing almost as much as the "lube" bit for some reason.