lpg, the law relating to negligence is based on precedent and on the principle of what a 'reasonable man' might do in that situation. For example, if someone drives into the back of you, then the general principle is that they should be leave sufficient distance between you and themselves and be aware of the road conditions. The situation you describe is slightly different. If you decide to undertake cars then you are doing something inherently dangerous. However, the car drivers should be aware that in heavy traffic then cyclists might undertake and that they should exercis caution when turning. In this case it would be dealt with on a split liability basis... god I'm boring!
lpg, the law relating to negligence is based on precedent and on the principle of what a 'reasonable man' might do in that situation. For example, if someone drives into the back of you, then the general principle is that they should be leave sufficient distance between you and themselves and be aware of the road conditions. The situation you describe is slightly different. If you decide to undertake cars then you are doing something inherently dangerous. However, the car drivers should be aware that in heavy traffic then cyclists might undertake and that they should exercis caution when turning. In this case it would be dealt with on a split liability basis... god I'm boring!