No pics though, that takes time, maybe a camcorder, and all you want to demonstrate is there is a definite difference between 'bicylists' i.e. people who use bicycles, and 'cyclists', people consumed with a passion who have to use the same space. No range war, just a notification that streets are crowded (everything is crowded) and no one who shares space can behave as if they are the only one, because they've got a rusty winter hulk and have just decided to use it in the mainstream with no 'L' sign and no road sense. At least practice in a quiet area 'til you can control what you are doing. That I believe is what the faltering car test tries to provide.
This sounds a bit elitist to me; making a distinction between cyclists and people who use bicycles. I wonder which group you consider yourself to belong to?
So what, the sun is out and people bring their bikes out for their commute. Maybe they don't want to spend cash before deciding whether to carry on or not. WTF gives you the right to destabilise them. What would you think of a car driver who objects to you holding him up and decided to give you a nudge?
This sounds a bit elitist to me; making a distinction between cyclists and people who use bicycles. I wonder which group you consider yourself to belong to?
So what, the sun is out and people bring their bikes out for their commute. Maybe they don't want to spend cash before deciding whether to carry on or not. WTF gives you the right to destabilise them. What would you think of a car driver who objects to you holding him up and decided to give you a nudge?