chris crash, u mug, 'your theory' of art is nothing more than wishy washy romanticism, expressed in an overly simplistic manner. The notion that 'art' refers to objects that posess no untility is patantly absurd - where does that leave literature? Where would you draw the line between utility and aesthetic satisfaction?
have u never read any aristotle? all art serves a dual purpose - to insturct and delight - and suggesting that you can neatly seperate these properties is absurd.
chris crash, u mug, 'your theory' of art is nothing more than wishy washy romanticism, expressed in an overly simplistic manner. The notion that 'art' refers to objects that posess no untility is patantly absurd - where does that leave literature? Where would you draw the line between utility and aesthetic satisfaction?
have u never read any aristotle? all art serves a dual purpose - to insturct and delight - and suggesting that you can neatly seperate these properties is absurd.