-
• #2251
-
• #2252
It has 0-rake and 1:1 gear ration.. like a velo acrobatique bike.
That woulda been some spectacular polo.yep, what a ride. Actually 1.1 : 1 ratio, no? 22t CR, 20t cog. Same as a lot of trials riders use, I gather.
-
• #2253
-
• #2254
Interesting to see after Nike dumped the whole Trek joint venture for roadie gear. great idea but foul execution. Roll on something a tad more wearable in real life.
+1
Those shoes are nasty IMO... -
• #2255
and the outfits too.
-
• #2256
-
• #2257
Oh, and by the way. I believe it's traditionally Scotch Whisky, and Irish *Whiskey*.
[/alcohol fascism]I humbly stand corrected. I'm more of a ginn...... gunni........ giuni....... guinis......
............. f### it, gimme another pint of that black stuff!
-
• #2258
Oh, and that frame is a track frame with a double down tube. It's pretty stunning.
Howdy All! You mean this?
DW
-
• #2259
That is the most rediculously over-engineered chainring I've ever seen. Well done.
-
• #2260
Oooh, more pictures.
This one is nice, I love the matching angles on the chain stays and the down tubes. Also love how that Wound Up looks, I hope Robin Mather doesn't object too much if I deny him the fun of making forks.
-
• #2261
It's just so clean...
-
• #2262
I dont know if it had been shown, as someone just tipped me off to that the bike was on here, but heres the headtube shot.
enjoy!
DW
-
• #2263
It's tiny though.
-
• #2264
It's tiny though.
I was going to make it using 24 inch wheels instead of 650c, but had problems finding tires. its a 34c-t with a 41 top tube. She is 7 years old.
DW
-
• #2265
mr walker is there a reason why you didn't use the royal flush larger paul crankset? i know there are virtually none around till later in the year, but curious if was just for simplicity?
-
• #2266
I was going to make it using 24 inch wheels instead of 650c, but had problems finding tires. its a 34c-t with a 41 top tube. **She is 7 years old.
**
DWAh! It all makes sense now!
P.S. It's nice of you to come on here and talk to us about it.
-
• #2267
mr walker is there a reason why you didn't use the royal flush larger paul crankset? i know there are virtually none around till later in the year, but curious if was just for simplicity?
The cranks are 150's. My daughter cant push a bigger gear and Paul only had the round hole ring in a 46. It worked out ok, i think...
DW
-
• #2268
Ah! It all makes sense now!
P.S. It's nice of you to come on here and talk to us about it.
No problem...thats to a frameforum member (franco-phile) he told me about this place this morning. I had no clue...
Glad you all enjoy having me here....thus far. ;)
DW
-
• #2269
it's a really lovely bike (the fillet brazing is sooooo clean), but there are too many logos on those wheels...
-
• #2270
it's a really lovely bike (the fillet brazing is sooooo clean), but there are too many logos on those wheels...
Thanks..3 or 4 is about standard anymore...even with Zipp. Just think "Show bike"....
DW
-
• #2271
Your 7yr old rides a brakeless fix? Brave!
-
• #2272
Your 7yr old rides a brakeless fix? Brave!
not exactly yet...she is getting close. Pulling her training wheels off her first bike today. She will be taking the class at Major Taylor in a few weeks. we'll see how she does.
DW
-
• #2273
this has been in my head for the last half hour. but, won't the duel down tube weigh more than a normal down tube ie increased surface area, more paint, more welds??? where's tommy?
-
• #2274
I'm fairly sure she's not a weight weenie.
-
• #2275
this has been in my head for the last half hour. but, won't the duel down tube weigh more than a normal down tube ie increased surface area, more paint, more welds??? where's tommy?
It might, but an ounce or two isnt a big enough deal to worry about. The bike was so small, it doesnt even use double butted tubing. The twin doentubes are only 5/8 of an inch in diameter.
DW