You are reading a single comment by @.__ and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • [cite]Leeww:[/cite]No it is correctly an ad hominem, you call Gore a hypocrite (he may be for all I know) - that is an ad hominem argument and has no bearing on the science[/b]

    the-smiling-buddha What science ? Al Gore is a politician and the scientists at the IPCC don't include this in their scenarios.

    I think you are attempting deliberate obfuscation through your muddled conflation of Al Gore as a person and the findings of the IPCC.

    Poor technique if you wish to discuss something honestly and openly. :(

    Your own view of Al Gore is simply that, your own view, it may be correct, Al Gore is a serial rapist and has a 10 speed derailleur for all I know - but importantly his hypocrisy, electricity bill or his sex life have no bearing on the science - by definition your argument is ad hominem.

    Once again for clarity, your personal dislike of Gore (and his hypocrisy) has no bearing on the science of global warming.

    [cite]Leeww:[/cite]
    and you have yet to enlighten me on the science of ice sheet collapse.

    And with that pointless comment I shall bow out of this thread and hand over the reigns to you, best of luck.

About

Avatar for .__ @.__ started