Global warming my arse

The IPCC make a single unambiguous prediction with regard to their research on sea level rises - an increase of between 28cm and 43cm.

This is the 'high' scenario the 'low' scenario predicts 18 to 38 cm

**The IPCC make a single unambiguous prediction with regard to their research on sea level rises - an increase of between 28cm and 43cm.

This is likely to happen regardless of any other consequences of a rise in the worlds temperature.
**

How likely is likely ? the IPCC's best prediction is somewhere between the high and low scenarios

and as I started earlier the IPCC do not know the accuracy/inaccuracy of their models

The ice sheet collapse is a possible consequence of a rise in the worlds temperature and is not included in the IPCC remit.

The IPCC scenarios are based on surface air warming so why if ice sheet collapse is a credible risk is it not included in the IPCC remit

No it is correctly an ad hominem, you call Gore a hypocrite (he may be for all I know) - that is an ad hominem argument and has no bearing on the science

What science ? Al Gore is a politician and the scientists at the IPCC don't include this in their scenarios

and you have yet to enlighten me on the science of ice sheet collapse

And long may it remain a political activist movement.

Now this is where I beg to differ

In the United States climate change has now become a 'liberal' issue

what this means is that people of a conservative persuasion are not listening

now you can accuse them of being ignorant all you like

but the fact remains that these are the people who most need to change

not helped I might add by the fact that Al Gore with his obscenely large electricity bills

allowed himself to be portrayed as a hypocrite