You are reading a single comment by @the-smiling-buddha and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Seems to me that predicting a 20ft rise in sea levels is a pretty effective scare tactic

    But how credible is this claim if it is not supported by the IPCC

    and if it were credible why doesn't the IPCC have ice sheet collapse as it's 'high' scenario

    The estimates from the IPCC are conservative for good reason I would imagine

    The word you seek is not Ad hominem but hypocrisy

    It is hypcoritical to preach about reducing one carbon footprints

    Then doing nothing to reduce ones own carbon footprint

    buying carbon credits in ones own company is ethically nothing more than sleight of hand

    It creates the impression that wealthy people can just buy themselves a green conscious

    Like I said earlier I didn't post because I had doubts

    I posted because I wanted to see what the response was going to be

    "See, I don't even like to call it the environmental movement any more, because really it is a political activist movement, and they have become hugely influential at a global level." Patrick Moore founding member and former President of Greenpeace.

About