Lorries in London, it'd be alright if cyclists just saw their point of view.

brett
Every situation is different.
Every collision between motorist and cyclist will involve motorist/cyclist of differing abilities at what they are doing, combined with individual circumstances specific to the moment. Even perfectly competent drivers/riders have off days - who hasn't thought at one point or other, "Shit what was I thinking there?" The point is, it's impossible to look at incidents like these and generalise about "cyclists", "motorists", "cab drivers", "lorry drivers" or whoever.
However, it is possible to say that cyclists are more vulnerable than other road users, by virtue of the fact that they're not surrounded by a ton or so of metal. Therefore, if you're going to think about cycling, it's worth understanding this, and taking the necessary measures to protect yourself. I expect most people here do, but when green cycle paths are painted down the left hand side of many junctions, a less experienced person may be led to think that following them is a good idea.
So: if, (for example) an inexperienced cyclist is injured or worse by a left turning lorry who didn't see them, then I agree completely that the lorry is at fault. However, a more experienced cyclist wouldn't have found themselves in that situation. We know the law is an ass, but it's better to avoid potentially dangerous situations than to come a cropper knowing that you weren't in the wrong. The truth is, it can be dangerous out there. Personally, I try and take the time to explain how to avoid potential dangers to my less experienced cycling mates, and hope it does some good.

Sorry, that's quite tedious - is it time to ride the bridges yet?

Not tedious, but I have to point out that even experienced cyclists have ended up under the wheels of a lorry. I am thinking of Charlie Courtnoys. That's why even experienced cyclists should always pay atttention to what lorries are doing (or not doing).