-
Jeff didn't look like he was getting stuck in so could be traitor
I know it's all bollocks, but I can't figure how people come up with this reasoning
tasks win money - whoever wins the game in the end, traitor or faithful gets money
so there's no reason for a traitor to not try. unless they've introduced some twists in later seasons I'm not aware of -
At least the first 'mission' had an element that the Traitors could use to sabotage this time, always thought they should have something otherwise as you say it's just 'Frank missed that shot so must be a traitor' which never made sense as the traitors would also want to maximise money, sabotaging a missions would just screw them over. I've only watched the UK versions so assume this has been done in series from other countries already tbf.
I do hope the 3 people who got off the train are just out of it though, will be crap if they get to waltz back in.
You are reading a single comment by @efb and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
duncs
ric_a5
@efb
The tasks have always played second fiddle to the murders and banishments, which provide the drama. Tasks are mainly about getting the money and a little bit of 'oh yeah, Jeff didn't look like he was getting stuck in so could be traitor'.
Have to say S3 feels like it has gone down a notch to join other reality shows, there's load more whooping and ridiculous overreactions and crying. Still hooked though.