-
• #8152
Yeah, I can get 2.6" MTB tyres in the Ogre. That explains why they went with a larger BB shell I guess.
-
• #8153
Now I'm spoiled for choice... which set to I start with? How much are we betting that none of them work?
1 Attachment
-
• #8154
Hmm, anyone got a "Park Tool LRT-4 - Shimano Direct Mount Chainring Lockring Tool" in west London? My BB tool ain't gonna engage enough to tighten the 12s chainring on.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/LRT-4-Shimano-Direct-Mount-Lockring/dp/B083WMQP91
This article mentions a plastic spacer that goes between crank and chainring, which obviously isn't on the fucking cranks I bought. How important is it? Something an LBS might have?
https://mountainbikevibes.com/how-to-replace-a-shimano-direct-mount-chainring/
-
• #8155
Someone borrowed my tool and didn't return it, I actually know where he works so might pay him another visit...
That plastic spacer is only required for the XX2055mm chainline cranksets.
-
• #8156
I've ordered a Shimano one. Figure I'll try and test fit these 12s cranks and if it looks like it will work, I'll get the LBS to tighten the lockring and then I'm good to go.
What about BB spacers? It's a 73mm shell and a 73mm BB so I assume I don't need any of their spacers? ASS u ME.
-
• #8157
1 spacer on the drive side to take up the space of a chain guide.
-
• #8159
AliExpress. Ztto jobbies, in different flavours of bearings
-
• #8160
Definitely needs a spacer on the drive side.
-
• #8161
Either that or a chainring with a greater offset from the likes of unite or wolftooth..
-
• #8162
11-30 probably ok, it really down to the hanger length.
-
• #8163
Why? It's not as close to the chainstay as the photo appears to show. I never found a lockring tool so I'm not going to bother putting the chain on until I know it will fly.
-
• #8164
Because they're designed to have one, you'll have 2.5mm excess axle going into the NDS crank and slightly asymmetric cranks, which will probably do nothing if you can preload them without bottoming out the nut.
-
• #8165
slightly asymmetric cranks
I have this with a pair of middleburns at the moment, it's actually better if I remove the DS spacer specified by Shimano for the BB
Asymmetric, as measured by distance from pedal eye to centre of seat tube, as I wasn't certain whether the chainstays would be symmetrical. IE the q factor is slightly different on each side
But it got me looking into it, and I found loads of comments on forums etc saying slightly asymmetrical cranks are completely normal and you'd be amazed how often this is the case. So I've decided to just not worry about it
I am no expert on square taper but I think it's particularly the case on these, as the BBs were often deliberately asymmetric? I think they often aimed to put the drive side crank where it needed to be for chainline and chainring/chainstay clearance, then just put the left hand crank as close in as possible, for narrower overall, but asymmetric, q.
Given we are talking about 2.5mm, there is a good chance your legs are not that symmetric anyway?
-
• #8166
Hippy's chainline will be 2.5mm out, without the spacer, assuming (!) it's a correct match otherwise. But whether that will make any difference to anything is another question
But also - that BB comes with not 1 but 3 of the spacers, as it is compatible with both 68 and 73 shells - so you ought to have it somewhere
-
• #8167
Yeah, I said it'll probably do nothing, most people's legs and frames are a bit wonky anyway.
If the fucking bike industry stopped being dickheads for 5mins this never would've happened.
This is why I always try to buy bikes with the same boring things - 68mm BBs, 27.2 seatpost, etc are a more important consideration to me than most other factors. I'm trying to fight "standards" propagation one silly purchase at a time. Used bikes are tickier though.