Apologies, I didn't mean to trivialise the work required to comply, this would deffo be an additional overhead but not impossible.
The benefit being that it would allow the forum to continue to exist in much the same format.
We've also seen a few people willing to step up amd help you with this, which we'd really love to do. It must all feel so overwhelming right now.
Re. CSAM,
I read that it is a requirement only for high risk sites, and I think it's reasonable to justify that this is not a high risk site.
Re. Mods, agree.
We'd need things like an admin email address, defined volunteers, moderator best practice guidance.
We'll also need to document things like complaints resolution process, appeals resolution process, details around age verification, SLAs for mod response, forum members terms of use etc etc etc.
Happy to start drafting some of this if it's an approach we want to explore, but feel like waiting until the Jan guidance seems sensible before making any firm plans.
Apologies, I didn't mean to trivialise the work required to comply, this would deffo be an additional overhead but not impossible.
The benefit being that it would allow the forum to continue to exist in much the same format.
We've also seen a few people willing to step up amd help you with this, which we'd really love to do. It must all feel so overwhelming right now.
Re. CSAM,
I read that it is a requirement only for high risk sites, and I think it's reasonable to justify that this is not a high risk site.
Re. Mods, agree.
We'd need things like an admin email address, defined volunteers, moderator best practice guidance.
We'll also need to document things like complaints resolution process, appeals resolution process, details around age verification, SLAs for mod response, forum members terms of use etc etc etc.
Happy to start drafting some of this if it's an approach we want to explore, but feel like waiting until the Jan guidance seems sensible before making any firm plans.