That’s the thing, I and others could convince you to continue at risk, albeit a small one. But should it materialise (in a big way) we wouldn’t be able to bail you out.
Instead of nuking the site, could you put it on ice in the possibility of a reversal/clarification in policy?
That’s the thing, I and others could convince you to continue at risk, albeit a small one. But should it materialise (in a big way) we wouldn’t be able to bail you out.
Instead of nuking the site, could you put it on ice in the possibility of a reversal/clarification in policy?