-
I suppose it’s not easy to extrapolate the HMRC £100 interest rule to PBs held in child’s name, and I think HMRC approach would be based more on core principles that money held in a Child’s account should be solely for Child’s benefit and both the initial investment and any income derived from it should not be subject to being claimed back by the parent at a future date, because if they were than it could have the appearance of intentional tax evasion, i.e. sidestepping the £50K allowance on PBs and their associated benefits that adults are granted.
I've had some similar conversations recently (not my money), but limited appetite for wealth management help given the cost involved. Would be interesting to know if they are happy with the scale of admin involved to keep it as efficient as possible?
In case its helpful, these were the broad topics we discussed. Med-low risk options are probably:
I would probably be doing some fag-packet calculations on what returns you would get with a mix of the above, with a bit of tax thrown in. Wealth managers may have access to some savings products that you don't, but I'd be surprised if there was a big difference.
Tax efficiency will be important but this may make things administratively more complicated. Some things to consider: