You are reading a single comment by @cjr and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I've had some similar conversations recently (not my money), but limited appetite for wealth management help given the cost involved. Would be interesting to know if they are happy with the scale of admin involved to keep it as efficient as possible?

    In case its helpful, these were the broad topics we discussed. Med-low risk options are probably:

    • cash interest accounts
    • premium bonds
    • government bonds
    • stocks and shares
    • pension

    I would probably be doing some fag-packet calculations on what returns you would get with a mix of the above, with a bit of tax thrown in. Wealth managers may have access to some savings products that you don't, but I'd be surprised if there was a big difference.

    Tax efficiency will be important but this may make things administratively more complicated. Some things to consider:

    • if you are comfortable putting £50k of PB in your daughters name then you could have a bigger chunk of the cash interest-bearing accounts in her name and utilise her larger savings allowance/20% tax rate rather than your 40% rate
    • Assume you are happy with the way the return works on PB's (not linear/guaranteed)
    • If you go for any equities you probably want the majority in the ISA to keep unpredictable gains tax free, bearing in mind your CGT allowance. This means the more predictable savings income is taxable - likely easier to manage subject to base rate changes
    • Pick low coupon govt bonds to maximise the CGT-free benefit
    • Consider using your pension allowances and taking it back as your lump sum later [may not work with your timeframe]
  • I’m pretty sure children’s allowance on interest drops to £100 if the money is given to them by a parent. Specifically to stop parents using their kids to avoid tax on interest.

  • I suppose it’s not easy to extrapolate the HMRC £100 interest rule to PBs held in child’s name, and I think HMRC approach would be based more on core principles that money held in a Child’s account should be solely for Child’s benefit and both the initial investment and any income derived from it should not be subject to being claimed back by the parent at a future date, because if they were than it could have the appearance of intentional tax evasion, i.e. sidestepping the £50K allowance on PBs and their associated benefits that adults are granted.

About

Avatar for cjr @cjr started