I never actually said this
No, but that's the only way I can explain
Are the developing nations better off walking out with nothing or walking away with something?
If the "something" isn't enough to achieve its stated aim, why would you help the donor countries get their greenwashing press release?
Unless you're convinced the "something" they're turning down is enough, based on some carefully costed scheme you're just choosing not to share.
I look at it from the very simple perspective that something is better than nothing. On that particular point, it’s no deeper than that.
But on the broader take, I think the whole thing is a sham and no one comes out of it looking particularly good.
I look at it from the very simple perspective
You should probably preface all your posts with this.
@Ben689908 started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
No, but that's the only way I can explain
If the "something" isn't enough to achieve its stated aim, why would you help the donor countries get their greenwashing press release?
Unless you're convinced the "something" they're turning down is enough, based on some carefully costed scheme you're just choosing not to share.