-
Perhaps that your stated conclusion doesn't seem to follow from everything else you've said.
The poorer developing nations, which are generally disadvantaged by lack of resources and/or colonial history, are being asked to skip the only development path any existing country has ever successfully followed, directly to a utopian carbon-neutral future that no existing rich country has achieved despite vastly greater resources.
This unprecedented great leap forward is, apparently, "their bit".
The fact that it's all based on importing technology from China or the developed world, who coincidentally emitted most of the carbon that made this necessary, is no reason to negotiate for more money, right?
It's more important to know their place and act grateful than it is to ensure that enough resources are allocated to actually achieve anything.
You are reading a single comment by @useless and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
useless
Ben689908
Shady is an interesting choice of word. Are you suggesting I am hiding something?