-
• #902
Pretty standard fare today, but I think some of you will hate it.
-
• #903
Three under. Mildly convoluted but a ok.
Realised that I never got round to revisitng yesterday's clue, so googled it. It was exactly the construction I had thought but I just failed to get the anagram. Silly me.
-
• #904
Took thinking of a few synonyms and back fitting but got there.
-
• #905
One under.
-
• #906
2 over
-
• #907
+2 no time to ponder
-
• #908
Correct.
-
• #909
Exactly
-
• #910
2 under, very clunky clue, did not enjoy
-
• #911
Even par
-
• #912
Understood what I was meant to do. Didn't know the answer though.
2 over. -
• #913
Ah, I didn't think about ten pin bowling.
-
• #914
1 over, took the hint and two letters, shitshow
-
• #915
Par
-
• #916
Twunder.
Dodgy clue IMO
-
• #917
Get fucked
-
• #918
+3
-
• #919
Yeah, not well structured. Would have liked someone with the Graun's standard of cluemakers to have had this idea. Fair play to the guy, but it could have been done better.
-
• #920
-2 but didn’t really get the use of ‘block’ to mean what it means here.
-
• #921
Two under, didn’t mind it
-
• #922
2 over. Fucksticks
-
• #923
Two under. Easy peas. Don't see there's any issue with the clue.
-
• #924
Agreed on this by the way - tempted to print it off and send it in for a crack at the prize!
-
• #925
It's a twunder
I always like the ones with several words. 3ndr