And the fact that they went for the controlling, top-down option illustrates that that is the type of people they are.
Does it or was it situational? I'm not sure of the answer. The situation was that a weak incumbent wanted to stand and the party was powerless to stop him entering a primary. As an incumbent who has already beaten the likely opponent it would be hard to see him losing the primary. His weaknesses would be really exposed in the primary, causing problems in the election therefore you avoid the problems and skip the primary.
It's a pretty unique position they found themselves in.
He would have been utterly shredded by Kennedy, and anyone else for that matter, in a primary debate. And they really did not want Kennedy as their candidate.
The reason they didn't have a primary is because Biden would have lost.
I think he would have limped through greatly damaged. I see Kennedy as a fringe candidate who can do damage but not win a primary or an election. If you have evidence otherwise let me know.
Does it or was it situational? I'm not sure of the answer. The situation was that a weak incumbent wanted to stand and the party was powerless to stop him entering a primary. As an incumbent who has already beaten the likely opponent it would be hard to see him losing the primary. His weaknesses would be really exposed in the primary, causing problems in the election therefore you avoid the problems and skip the primary.
It's a pretty unique position they found themselves in.