You are reading a single comment by @t-v and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • So in summary:

    • replacing an evidently senile candidate late in the day
    • with a widely unpopular VP
    • with no democratic process
    • who then launched her campaign by leaning into a north London public school mean girls meme
    • and calling the other guy weird
    • while offering not a lot more

    Wasn't successful in the swing states to voters concerned about their precarious economic position?

    And this is with corporate donor money out stripping Trump by 3 to 1 (Harris raising nearly a billion dollars during the campaign).

  • Who could have predicted it would end this way???

    It's like they looked at Hillary's campaign and said 'Well, I know this was a spectacular failure last time, but what about if this time it just magically wasn't?'

  • Listening to TRIP with Dominic Sandbrook, he said a similar thing. Something along the line of if you asked a casting agency to find a candidate most likely to alienate the blue collar they would have created Harris.

  • I thought a similar thing re the funding. Trump has twice won it with less money. It's totally destroyed that old stat about the biggest war chest winning the presidency.

About

Avatar for t-v @t-v started