You are reading a single comment by @hugo7 and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • So, the Times is blaming 2 decades of slow wage growth on the next 2.5 years of Labour government and it's nothing to do with the previous 14 years of Tory government

  • Don't suppose anyone has read the underlying report from the resolution foundation?

    Would be curious to know if there are proposals, as I wonder what a goverment can realistically do to increase wages. Is this actually symptomatic of a system of a market that has driven efficiencies of returns for shareholders while not creating a sufficient number of new high paying jobs?

  • Not read the RF report, but there's also the underlying reality of rising housing costs in addition to stagnating wages over the next decade — see modelling from the JRF here: https://x.com/alfie_stirling/status/1851686979693425131

    Would be curious to know if there are proposals, as I wonder what a goverment can realistically do to increase wages.

    I'd imagine they're hanging their hat on the minimum wage increase, planning reform, and the upcoming employment rights bill to take up some of the slack. Honestly though, the employer national insurance increase was just a bad idea — it'll likely put downward pressure on wages in the long term, since it's a tax on turnover rather than profit.

    The NI increase may even kickstart companies moving people from more secure salaries into the gig economy, so I hope Labour are still pushing the merger between employee and worker status to make sure this doesn't happen.

    Is this actually symptomatic of a system of a market that has driven efficiencies of returns for shareholders while not creating a sufficient number of new high paying jobs?

    Without doubt, sadly.

About

Avatar for hugo7 @hugo7 started