-
finding it difficult to break away from taking technically 'correct' images
..have you tried drinking five pints before going on your photo walk?
Jokes aside I like your shots, especially the last two.
Regarding the "full coverage" - I think it's fair to do this, even if it's a picture shown digitally, in the end - actually, to me it's quite the same as when actually printing the negative on paper: can look stupid / like a "gimmick", but can just as well look very natural and fitting, it always kinda depends 💁
salad-
..have you tried drinking five pints before going on your photo walk?
I think the camera might still win!
I reckon it's just that I've been mostly out and about in subdued lighting and using the 15mm lens it's almost impossoble to have things out of focus and even really slow shutter speeds produce really sharp images too!
M_V
I'd normally print sort of 'full coverage' like this rather than cropping into the frame, opinions on how well it works for digitsied images?
These are from my Hexar RF, I'd like to get a bit more ummm, expressive with it but I'm finding it difficult to break away from taking technically 'correct' images with it.