You are reading a single comment by @danb and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Ramp test based ftp tests are designed to work with seated efforts only - standing skews them.

    For training efforts, do what you want though.
    I normally only stand for <30s efforts or perhaps for a few pedal strokes on long 10min+ efforts

  • If TRs data analysis model is based on people not throwing in a massive finishing sprint and you're wanting to use TR to train then it seems pretty silly to counter their advice just for dickswinging watts on your FTP.

    This is an interesting article on a few different options though:

    https://www.cyclingweekly.com/fitness/i-tried-5-alternatives-to-the-old-20-minute-ftp-test-and-i-wont-be-going-back

  • Why would it skew it though? you are just riding a bunch of 1 min intervals are you not, where you need to hold an average power until you fail an interval? I haven't done a ramp test for years, all I remember is it was really easy and then really intense for a few minutes at the end and it gave me a massively high FTP estimate.

    tldr @ghostface I hadn't seen that but yes, I agree with Jesse. This idea that you can cheat the shorter tests by sprinting at the end....ok, but if you want an accurate test, just...don't sprint at the end.

About

Avatar for danb @danb started