-
Thanks for your thoughts.
Hard to see a 'good' result any way by any objective standards, but if I can make a few quid by calling at least part of the result, that feels like a more achievable goal!
What l said about the yougov poll above is wrong as it looks like they didn't run that pair - jenrick vs clev.
https://ygo-assets-websites-editorial-emea.yougov.net/documents/Internal_ConMembers_August2024.pdfOne thought is to lay jenrick and back tugs now on the basis that jenrick needs to do a good speech to keep his hot favourite position and might not, and tugs could improve his odds by saying something half decent - and I think he is meant to be reasonably bright and a good speaker, no?
But maybe that's trying to be too clever, might be better to wait until odds settle ahead of the next round...
You are reading a single comment by @Grumpy_Git and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
frank9755
@Grumpy_Git
Tugs hasn't "done" anything and doesn't have public breakthrough. He needs a proper (shadow, ha) ministerial position for a decent amount of time. Still im a random dude on the internet.
Bad enough or Kendrick winning would give labour a free pass to keep being fucking useless.
Cleverly or Tugs may force them (edit:labour) to do politics and give up the freebies but would risk being a functional opposition.