You are reading a single comment by @Festerban and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Anyway, the reasoning behind the 2019 amendments to what consititues a ‘flick knife’ were:

    The previous definition of a “flick knife” referred to the mechanism that activates the blade being in, or attached to, the handle of the knife. This did not capture more recent designs of knives which are now available which mimic the speed and way in which a flick knife can be opened through a mechanism not in the handle itself.

    I can’t imagine where an automatic opener could have a mechanism anywhere other than the handle (or attached to it.) No doubt there was a specific loophole they were closing - can anyone figure out what kind of thing it was trying to curtail?

  • It should be noted that knives that open manually, including those which can be opened with a thumb stud, do not fall under the amended definition of a flick knife.

    (Same link). So it seems quite clear that thumb studs are allowed. (Which makes sense - the thumb stud is not a mechanism which activates the blade in itself, merely an assist to manual opening, and ruling out every thumb stud would in turn surely rules out any knife with a thumb indent as well, i.e every SAK in the country.)

    I take your point re speed of opening: I can certainly open most of my knifes with a thumb stud with a ‘flick’ provided that I’m holding them right. Which begs the question of course what and why the legislation is designed to prevent.

    I always wondered about the legality of the CRKT provoke, which has a fairly unique mechanism. It’s not automatic (despite ‘kinematic’ branding), nor a gravity knife, but doesn’t appear to be stocked anywhere in the UK. It doesn’t seem to be covered neatly by any legislation.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=birKtIe7HRY

About

Avatar for Festerban @Festerban started