You are reading a single comment by @greentricky and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
In this scenario have I had multiple warnings and requests to comply that I have ignored before being charged?
Also surely in your scenario I would be the institution providing the ISA, not the ISA owner?
(I'll read the article in case it answers these questions)
greentricky-
To be clear, I was giving the furthest end of the scale that came to mind to highlight whether you hold an owner or senior officer of the company liable for its actions.
Imo it should be both, subject to a threshold. Ideally one that could catch large institutional investors to encourage them to be activist shareholders. But I haven't really thought it through properly.
hugo7
Is there a certain % which you would say makes you the owner? If we take the ridiculous end of the spectrum - if you have a tracker ISA which ultimately owns shares in a naughty company, then we wouldn't expect you to be liable for their actions.
This is maybe a better peice on the controversy https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/8/28/drug-dealers-to-putin-critics-behind-pavel-durovs-rare-telegram-audience