There's nothing in the press about SBF's sentence being too harsh in the light of the astonishing 18% profit made by the creditors. How come? He was such big news when he was exposed and prior to that he had lots of the top people in his fan club. Why the silence?
But he was such a phenomenon that journalists ought to be pitching in with contentious pieces about victimless crime and so forth. It ought to be such an easy sell to an editor.
There's nothing in the press about SBF's sentence being too harsh in the light of the astonishing 18% profit made by the creditors. How come? He was such big news when he was exposed and prior to that he had lots of the top people in his fan club. Why the silence?