although details are a bit sketchy (washington post article is paywalled so i read some free sources), it seems that the massive rise in cyrpto prices has enabled the solvent liquidation.
so you could say
a) that's essentially luck and;
b) if the creditors still had their crypto assets, they'd be a lot more than 18% up.
agree that on the face of it the sentence looks quite harsh, but otoh SBF played with a lot of fire and got quite burned.
although details are a bit sketchy (washington post article is paywalled so i read some free sources), it seems that the massive rise in cyrpto prices has enabled the solvent liquidation.
so you could say
a) that's essentially luck and;
b) if the creditors still had their crypto assets, they'd be a lot more than 18% up.
agree that on the face of it the sentence looks quite harsh, but otoh SBF played with a lot of fire and got quite burned.