-
• #877
As which country...
I definitely couldn't. Then again, with some googling and conveniently optimistic maths...I've raced it once, last month, and ran 12.6s
The slowest guy in the preliminary rounds ran 12.1s
I reckon I could take half a second off if I trained for 4 years, or learned to use the blocks
Also would need a Tongan passport and hope nobody else tried to run fasterAlright fine, no chance of me being the surprise 46yr old Tongan via SE London sprint sensation in LA
-
• #878
There are 7 million people aged 15 to 24 in the UK, around 10% of the population. In 4 years’ time that cohort will be the right age for most Olympic sports. So 6% of the population thinking that with training they could compete in 4 years’ time isn’t ridiculous.
-
• #879
Nothing that requires subjective scoring is. We could cut the cost right down with some judicious culling:
A. Nothing that requires "scoring" - eliminates gymnastics, synchronised swimming, all martial arts, boxing, dressage, trampolining, breaking, etc..
B. Nothing where the Olympics is not the pinnacle competition; eliminates football, tennis, golf, basketball, etc..
C. Nothing with animals; eliminates showjumping and dressage (again)
D. Nothing that requires expensive permanent infrastructure; eliminates rowing (except beach sprints); canoeing, maybe others?Got to say I'm not happy about some of those outcomes but it would reduce cost massively and move firmly towards the citius, altius, fortius motto.
Of course it would never happen. Gymnastics is one pf the top TV audience figures, especially in the US.
-
• #880
Surely to get to 6% of the whole population, using that approach would mean HALF of the 15-24 cohort were Olympic standard capable ... not in a million years.
-
• #881
The answer is dressage cos the horse does all the work. Horse dancing is not a sport
Oh fo sho.
1 Attachment
-
• #882
I agree it’s ambitious.
-
• #883
27% of Britons reckon that they could qualify for a sport at the 2028 Olympics, if they started training today
Think of the size of the boat they'd have needed for the opening ceremony...
-
• #884
no one said breakdancing?!
-
• #885
In a interview today Tanya Grey head of uk sport said certain sports will need re evaluating in order to be top 5 in all medal performances !
-
• #886
Already dropped
Or not taken up for LA28 as it was an optional event -
• #887
isn’t ridiculous
It absolutely is ridiculous tbh. We're not talking just good, we're talking the sharpest tip of the spear.
It's not just about training, you need the natural physicals and the mentals for it. (E.g fast/slow twitch etc).
E.g Rowing, which was 7% of people I think on that list. Anyone under 6' or so is almost certainly out immediately, then you need people who have natural timing, you can't really teach that, you have it or you don't. (In my years coaching new rowers, it's amazingly rare to find someone who can actually keep decent time through the stroke, maybe one in every 500 people was a natural, if not less).
I guess you also have to factor in all the people who've already got a massive head start who you need to overtake, who've already been doing it for years and years and won't be answering yougov polls.
They are out there though, look at Helen Glover.
-
• #888
The answer changes a lot depending on whether the question is "could you meet unspecified qualifying criteria" or "could you get selected for team GB"
For golf to get selected for team GB youd have to be top 20 in the world minimum, making millions of dollars a year playing around the world. If 5% of respondants think that's realistic then there's no justification for them continuing their current lives and not switching to being a millionaire golfer
-
• #889
I'm taking the above as a complement despite not being addressed to me, having rowed stroke for a number of (very much) younger years.
Maybe there's a chance?(No - there isnt.)
-
• #890
Anyone under 6' or so is almost certainly out immediately
Can we just fill the boats with coxs?
-
• #892
After 2012 there was some do you fancy your chances thing aimed at young teens. My eldest submitted her physical dimensions and from that she was invited for a rowing try out in Salford Quays. More measurements and some physical tests ( no rowing) but she didn't make the cut. Some parents were doing a whole host of sports for an Olympic chance for their kids. These will be the ones labelled as just took up the sport x years ago.
-
• #893
My Olympic reform is:
1 person, per country, per event. (1 person can enter multiple events, e.g. 100m, 200m and Archery) (Team events still exist but you cannot do solo and team events, team events need to be mixed gender, Villa-Ru(le))
Nothing that requires horses
Replace football with 5 a side
Any previously won Olympic medals for your entered event must be worn at all time when competing (success ballast of sorts)
Getting the crowd to clap in time is instant disqualification
Olympic ring tattoos will receive aggressive litigation for copyright infringementadded:
90% of the rowing events, you do no need 1x 2x 4x 8x (although I do support adding Viking longship 20x racing)
Dancing
Biting medal will require full consumption of medal (thanks Dibble)
Swimming, freestyle to be renamed "front crawl", butterfly to be dropped, "Doggy paddle" to replace it -
• #894
Dafuq! Pipped from podium by Japan? What was their late run in?
Can't even see GB on the medal list. Were you guys there or did you boycott because France and Brexit means Brexit?
(sorry Pidders, I know, I know, it's just for the LOLs mate, chill out)
-
• #895
Nobody tell the author how much bikes are. Odd article by a somewhat uninformed person.
-
• #896
Anyone “jokingly” biting their medal should be made to eat it
-
• #897
Very good.
I'd add that any non-individual event has to be mixed. Rowing 4s & 8s, Madison, 4x100 etc. -
• #898
Unsurprisingly no one mentioning heavyweight boxing. Think AJ did it in 5 years and i'm 99% certain there was another Brit who did it in less.
-
• #899
Unsurprisingly no one mentioning heavyweight boxing
esp. when so many of our young kids and armchair fans are already in the right weight category.
-
• #900
100% this.
Yeah - but 6% reckon they could qualify for the 100m! Deluded.