-
I think I have said this before, but I find it fascinating as I think it is almost unfiltered stream of consciousness.
If you can get some context from elsewhere, it's fairly direct steps from one thought to another, but there are rarely any internal checks that most people consider essential (but carry out automatically):
whether a branching idea should be considered at all
prioritisation of ideas (or even ability to store more than one or two simple ideas in the 'foreground')
considering whether an idea should be spoken at all, further processed or dropped
It's kind of like his brain is a single core CPU with very limited storage that can only be flushed to voice.
This makes it similar to output of a basic natural language generation algorithm, e.g. using a Markov chain.
chez_jay-
This makes it similar to output of a basic natural language generation algorithm, e.g. using a Markov chain.
He speaks by using autocomplete.
-
It's kind of like his brain is a single core CPU with very limited storage that can only be flushed to voice.
Oh, that's good. Good description, I mean, obviously.
NotThamesWater
itsbruce
The crazy thing is, if you read it as a paragraph it's fucking nuts, but if you watch the video and turn your brain off/don't try to logically process more than one sentence at a time, it sounds real convincing. And because he talks so slowly it kind of makes you forget what he said three sentences ago so you process his fingers circling around more than you do the fact that he's just said one, no, one point four, two in the span of ten seconds.