You are reading a single comment by @branwen and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1814364410720219323.html
Jo Maugham from the Good Law Project has also tweeted about this.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1814364410720219323.html
Jo Maugham from the Good Law Project has also tweeted about this.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9x8j5p0992o
This is such a frustrating bit of reporting. If your data doesn't reach statistical significance, it doesn't mean you accept the null hypothesis, it means you don't have enough data to tell either way.
(And this is before we even get into the deeper issue that by restricting the data to only those at the Tavistock center, which was already notorious for not having the needed capacity, means that you're almost certainly excluding the a large proportion of those who are most likely to be effected)