You are reading a single comment by @nick_h. and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • One thing in the reporting today begs a question in my mind. The BBC news says that there was no ID on the gunman, and that he was identified via DNA. Does that mean that his (or one of his relatives?) DNA was is in the FBI/federal/state/police records because of a previous arrest/crime? Or is DNA collected more widely in the US than here in the UK?

  • Maybe they thought it was probably him because his car was nearby, and they got a DNA sample from his father to confirm it.

About

Avatar for nick_h. @nick_h. started