You are reading a single comment by @hugo7 and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • RE: The Cass Report - this critique from Yale Law School was released this past week

    The Review repeatedly misuses data and violates its own evidentiary standards by resting many conclusions on speculation. Many of its statements and the conduct of the York [systematic reviews] reveal profound misunderstandings of the evidence base and the clinical issues at hand,” says the paper. “The Review also subverts widely accepted processes for development of clinical recommendations and repeats spurious, debunked claims about transgender identity and gender dysphoria. These errors conflict with well-established norms of clinical research and evidence-based healthcare. Further, these errors raise serious concern about the scientific integrity of critical elements of the report’s process and recommendations.

  • Thanks for posting that. I don't want to minimise the value of people with direct experience, but I think it's really important when referencing critiques of scientific based reports to rely on reliable sources from experts in the field.

About

Avatar for hugo7 @hugo7 started