You are reading a single comment by @Fox and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Seems like +213 seats is a way more relevent piece of data
Correct. Labour ran an efficient and effective campaign, the allocation of resources to exactly the right places was masterful.
Fox-
Correct. Labour ran an efficient and effective campaign, the allocation of resources to exactly the right places was masterful.
Have you seen any analyses that bear this out? I haven't. A constituency-by-constituency comparison of 2019 and 2025 vote would be useful, but changes in borders could make this tricky.
I'm not being obtuse but I don't really understand the constant lowest vote share/lowest number of votes sniping already. That wasn't the task at hand, was it? Seems like +213 seats is a way more relevent piece of data