You are reading a single comment by @mespilus and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Hmmm, Sky?
    Surely just another craven over exploiter of a monopoly? Taking most sports away from free-to-air transmission, EPL being the most obvious, then overcharging for access.
    Also wantonly poor customer service, exploiting passive customers with above inflation annual increases.

  • Re sports, it was the EPL’s choice who to sell the rights to. And terrestrial channels still require tv license, which in combo with ad revenues I guess ultimately forces there hands in terms of where they spend their money. Not sure you can blame Sky, a for profit entity, for wanting to obtain content that enables them to make a profit. Agree that you don’t have to like it.

About

Avatar for mespilus @mespilus started