-
He will argue he had to vote in this way to get a ministerial position where he could effect change but it didn't really work out did it
In that he didn't win the leadership election and ended up leaving the party rather than toeing the line with Johnson and co. No, I guess it didn't work out in that sense, but I still think in a 2 party system with whips etc then it's a sad fact that you do need to go along with the party line on the vast majority of things and when you do decide to step out of line then be prepared that it might be the end of the political aspirations if it doesn't pan out.
I'm in the same boat as @ReekBlefs I think. I don't agree with Stewart's positions, but he does seem to have thought about them before getting there rather than jumped to the lunatic fringe or populist Truss, Johnson style positions.
Rory Stewart sounds like a "reasonable guy". He's not.
He is reasoned though. Which is a significant step up from most of the party.
-
He is reasoned though. Which is a significant step up from most of the party.
That wasn’t intended but it was intentional.
We can all do that with words.
Even Gove sounds fairly reasonable when interviewed, because voice, words used, etc.I remember that guardian IDS interview from years ago which made him sound reasonable and impassioned to make change and reform benefits.
He did. He fucking broke it.
....
https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2022/05/27/rory-stewart-has-centrist-hearts-fluttering-again-so-heres-his-voting-record/
He will argue he had to vote in this way to get a ministerial position where he could effect change but it didn't really work out did it