Thames Water: the existing assets need to be placed in a sovereign wealth fund.
The assets that were privatised were paid for by either Water Rates payers or central government.
Any assets installed since privatisation have been funded by Water Bill payers, as far as I know, no management team at TW has taken on debt or loans to fund increases in assets, only to pay dividends, and disproportionate executive salaries. Once the assets are ringfenced, asset managers can bid for management contracts, that stipulate environmental targets, to include minimising leaks of drinking water and zero discharge of untreated sewage into rivers.
Any assets installed since privatisation have been funded by Water Bill payers, as far as I know
Yes and no, yes asset maintenance, replacement and creation is paid for by bill payers but the cost is spread over the bill for decades, the money to pay for the investment is funded via debt
Do you have an example?
As far as I know TW managed to convince a Tory SoS for the Environment and the Treasury to allow an increase in annual water bills to cover the costs of the Thames Super Sewer in advance to fund the construction.
Thames Water: the existing assets need to be placed in a sovereign wealth fund.
The assets that were privatised were paid for by either Water Rates payers or central government.
Any assets installed since privatisation have been funded by Water Bill payers, as far as I know, no management team at TW has taken on debt or loans to fund increases in assets, only to pay dividends, and disproportionate executive salaries. Once the assets are ringfenced, asset managers can bid for management contracts, that stipulate environmental targets, to include minimising leaks of drinking water and zero discharge of untreated sewage into rivers.