Currency nowadays doesn't have intrinsic value, it has agreed value. The same is true of bitcoin but that doesn't make them the same.
Edit: what I mean with the above is that using bitcoin means using the non-centralised, non-government, relatively secure and transparent bitcoin network to send value. An unbanked Kenyan tribesman with a smartphone can buy something from Japan with bitcoin, which they theoretically couldn’t do without a government regulated bank account. Or a Venezuelan citizen, if they’re able to find someone who will take their currency for bitcoin, can actually their money overseas as bitcoin and more people will accept it (very few countries have exchanges for Venezuelan bolivars).
The ability to do that has value.
Double edit: seems I erased initial paragraph. I think I said something along the lines of bitcoin does have intrinsic value, and that’s why it’s considered a commodity, because owning bitcoin means you can transfer value with the network, and that’s useful and worth something.
Edit: what I mean with the above is that using bitcoin means using the non-centralised, non-government, relatively secure and transparent bitcoin network to send value. An unbanked Kenyan tribesman with a smartphone can buy something from Japan with bitcoin, which they theoretically couldn’t do without a government regulated bank account. Or a Venezuelan citizen, if they’re able to find someone who will take their currency for bitcoin, can actually their money overseas as bitcoin and more people will accept it (very few countries have exchanges for Venezuelan bolivars).
The ability to do that has value.
Double edit: seems I erased initial paragraph. I think I said something along the lines of bitcoin does have intrinsic value, and that’s why it’s considered a commodity, because owning bitcoin means you can transfer value with the network, and that’s useful and worth something.