In the news

You are reading a single comment by @branwen and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

RonnieOatmilk in reply to @branwen

To be clear I don't think it's a valid reason

Am I reading that right, that you don't think that sexually assauting a woman, and "only being found guilty in a civil court" is not a valid reason for him not to be president?

If I've got that wrong, I apologise in advance.

•

branwen in reply to @RonnieOatmilk

No, I don't think the lower burden of evidence required in a civil court should matter when there is evidence of multiple acts over many years, and that it should be enough to put people off, even if technically he's still allowed to run

About

Avatar for branwen @branwen started