In the news

You are reading a single comment by @hugo7 and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

RonnieOatmilk in reply to @branwen

To be clear I don't think it's a valid reason

Am I reading that right, that you don't think that sexually assauting a woman, and "only being found guilty in a civil court" is not a valid reason for him not to be president?

If I've got that wrong, I apologise in advance.

•

hugo7 in reply to @RonnieOatmilk

Because he is guilty on balance of probability - ie it is more likely he did it than did not.

That is not the same as saying that he did something beyond reasonable doubt.

He's obviously a vile cunt, but I don't think you can say he definitely did it, when actually he probably did it.

About

Avatar for hugo7 @hugo7 started