Been giving this some thought, after reading all the well thought out posts, and can see how being indoctrinated would make her interview in the way she did.
So I take back what I typed - no excuse but it wasn’t a good day for me!
But I do think I understand why the decision was made - she’s clearly seen as a security risk (intelligence and I doubt the interview and other comms with her have helped unless she’s had some better advice from a legal professional) and I guess the Bangladeshi dual citizenship (if I’ve understood correctly) makes it easier for the HO to revoke the British citizenship.
I’m genuinely staggered at the fact that there are so many returning IS fighters cutting about in the UK. That seems at odds with the Begum decision and I can’t believe they are not also seen as security risks. But I guess there is intelligence which we have absolutely no view of?
Been giving this some thought, after reading all the well thought out posts, and can see how being indoctrinated would make her interview in the way she did.
So I take back what I typed - no excuse but it wasn’t a good day for me!
But I do think I understand why the decision was made - she’s clearly seen as a security risk (intelligence and I doubt the interview and other comms with her have helped unless she’s had some better advice from a legal professional) and I guess the Bangladeshi dual citizenship (if I’ve understood correctly) makes it easier for the HO to revoke the British citizenship.
I’m genuinely staggered at the fact that there are so many returning IS fighters cutting about in the UK. That seems at odds with the Begum decision and I can’t believe they are not also seen as security risks. But I guess there is intelligence which we have absolutely no view of?