You are reading a single comment by @andyp and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Decent run down of how we got here.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/feb/21/how-keir-starmer-averted-gaza-ceasefire-vote-crisis

    Still not sure I understand why if the labour amendment was not called they could not offer to support the SNP motion, or a free vote, it being quite similar to the labour amendment and closer to their new position than the government amendment.

    The main thing seems to be how inadequate a process this type of parliamentary process is. You had the spectre of a political party being seen to be fractured when in reality it seemed they now broadly to agree.

    This is a debate where precise language is important, yet we're using some massively complex and weaponised process to determine 'parliament's postion'.

    Shambles. I have massive sympathy for the speaker in trying to work out the best approach given what appears the very real prospect of danger to sitting MPs. World's gone mad.

  • There was an admission in another Guardian article that the Tory anger was artificial, from an unnamed minister.

About

Avatar for andyp @andyp started