You are reading a single comment by @Hulsroy and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Very nice, I'm interested why you took such an 'organic' path for the cable routing? Will it be possible to clear the powder from the tiny volumes at the chainstay ends?

  • The "rail" is defined by the shape of the yoke and sort of the easiest softest route through the yoke. The circular cross section is ø7mm ID for nice clearance for the cable/hose at the end of the channel the cross section is ø12mm to make it easier to guide the cable through. Using the sweep along rail command gives it this organic truncated look. Which I kind of like. It fits the outer appearance well I think. I've only been using SubD (and T-spline in fusion) modelling for a couple of years, but since we are 3D printing more and more I try to embrace to more organic look logic.

    I call it The Cor Yoke as it reassembles a heart/organ a bit.

    The 3d printing facility hasn't gotten back to us yet. But if the mini voids are a problem we will probably just make that part solid. They take care of all internal mesh structures anyways

  • Sounds like a valid methodology! With 3D printing there's no reason to minimise the number of bends you need to put in the tube, so why not make it a bit wavy rather than just two larger curves. I doubt it would make any noticeable difference to cable friction or ease of routing.

About

Avatar for Hulsroy @Hulsroy started