The fall of the Tory party

Posted on
Page
of 385
  • This is the press covering up for more Tory fuckups with a nothingburger. Again.

    Well, almost, the story was specifically released at this time as a cover for the real story they want to hide:

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/government-wine-spirits-covid-foreign-office-b2477216.html

    The government used 1,433 bottles of wine and spirits from its wine cellar during the Covid pandemic, the Foreign Office has admitted.

    The Government had been delaying releasing the details of booze usage through Covid as it would show the Government in a very bad light given the restrictions in place during that time. They said they're release the info on about 4 different occasions but kept on putting it off.

    Labour has critcised the government for the latest figures, as Shadow Attorney General, Emily Thornberry, said:

    “For months, we have asked why the government was suppressing the publication of this report, and now we know the answer.

  • Baroness Mone attempting to pivot badly from her husbands dubious tax affairs
    https://twitter.com/DanNeidle/status/1746568120733503945?t=Pz10xx92csjDjCLjt6ilNQ&s=19

  • "Better", shurely?!

  • They might win?

  • Need to fact check this, but I believe this poll was commissioned by a headbanger adjacent group and paid for by Frost.

    It handily suggests a move to the right to counter reform.

    This episode of the Bunker on Reform et al, is quite interesting. A key takeaway for me is that there is misunderstanding of the extent to which Reform voters are potential Tory voters. Also the intersection between Reform and Lib Dem voters.

    https://open.spotify.com/episode/0czjXQ0w4PFqQfRQdvsFFW?


    1 Attachment

    • Screenshot_20240116-082937.png
  • Looks like it was a headbanger group who commissioned it from YouGov and the Telegraph put their spin on it (which YouGov weren't too keen on):

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/48371-yougov-mrp-shows-labour-would-win-1997-style-landslide-if-election-were-held-today

    Notes on the Daily Telegraph’s analysis
    The Daily Telegraph wrote that “In constituencies across England and Wales, the Labour vote is up by an average of just four per cent compared to 2019”. This is somewhat of a red herring. There is a sum using certain notional results whereby the estimated Labour share looks like a mean of a four point rise on their 2019 performance. However, this is not the correct way to look at either implied national changes nor what is happening at the constituency level.

    If we aggregate up all our constituency level figures and then weight them according to likely voter population, the headline vote intention figures come out at the following:

    Labour 39.5%, Conservatives 26%, Lib Dems 12.5%, Reform 9%, Greens 7.5%, SNP 3%, Plaid 0.5%, Others 2%.

    A separate note by the Daily Telegraph suggested that the presence of Reform UK is the difference between Labour securing a majority and not. This is their own calculation using our data, and appears to be based simply on adding the Conservative and Reform UK vote shares together in each constituency, which is not a reliable way of measuring their impact.

    Were Reform UK not to contest the election, it is extremely unlikely that all, or even a majority, of their voters would transfer to the Conservatives. Some would go to UKIP and splinter parties, some to Labour and other established parties, and some would simply stay at home – YouGov polling in October found only 31% of Reform UK voters would be willing to vote Conservative if Reform UK were not standing in their constituency.

    Finally, the Daily Telegraph also said that the YouGov MRP model does not account for tactical voting in its estimated shares. This is not the case – our model does provision for tactical voting in its design, including by estimating constituency competition effects as part of the model equation. It does not, however, apply any post-hoc readjustments to vote share estimates based on any assumed model of tactical voting beyond what we already have in the data.

  • A long winded way of saying 'the Torygraph morons are misusing our data to justify their biased view'.

  • Cheers.

    Shocked and dismayed an upstanding paper would make so many errors resulting in misrepresented data in this way.

  • upstanding paper

    Did LOL

  • 30p Lee resigns as deputy chairman.

  • Da3r Pr1m Min5t3r,

    I resiNe.

    LeE

  • Leadership contest incoming?

  • Fucking hope so!

  • I doubt it. There is lots of jostling for position of leader after the election, but even dim-witted Tories realise leading the party into an election where they are going to be trounced is a poisoned chalice.

  • Resignation letter to Sunak says his support for him is '100% support... as strong as ever', just as he stabs him in the back.

    This is what happens when you empower and enable right-wing cunts. See also Braverman, Patel, Brexit and so on...

  • Yeah, Bill will pass tomorrow. The 'rebels' will engineer the numbers, allowing the big mouths in the group to keep their word and vote against, while enough will abstain/vote for to ensure it passes.

    If the bill doesn't pass I can't see how any of them benefit.

  • You're probably right. It'd be entertaining to squeeze in one more leadership clusterfuck before the GE though.

  • he will be our PM in 2029

  • Surely the only actual power Sunak now has left is to stuff the lot of them and call a General Election?

  • Maybe they'll keep pushing in the hopes of an election knowing that "I'm great and my constituents love me. It's the other bastards with no idea"

  • From BBC blog...

    "Who are the various Tory factions who are opposing the bill?"

    European Research Group
    New Conservatives
    Common Sense Group
    Northern Research Group
    Conservative Growth Group

    And the 'One Nation caucus' don't want any changes.
    😂

  • Unsurprisingly the 'rebels' turn out to be morally vacuous spineless cunts. Same old, same old.

  • The three people who resigned yesterday didn't vote no. Just staggeringly stupid.

  • Lee Anderson has said he abstained after going into the "No" lobby because Labour MPS WERE LAUGHING AT HIM

  • That is so good.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

The fall of the Tory party

Posted by Avatar for skydancer @skydancer

Actions