-
No, but I'll add it to the list. Cheers.
My OH and I really disagreed about this. I saw it coming and thought that it made sense based on the mood, the risk, and consolidating their position. Her logic was probably better - 2 votes isn't enough as a % to carry it in the event of others changing their opinion, so it's high risk with little upside and high downside.
The one thing I wonder about is the ability for Traitors to have any real tactics beyond getting rid of some stronger players early. The totally spurious reasons Faithfulls come up with for being guilty make it seem almost randomised - e.g. asking too many people who they'll vote for, being nervous in high pressure situations, making the totally fucking obvious point that early on given the ratios there is nothing solid to go on.
One thing is has made me think tho is it shows why our trials are the way they are. If you let 12 people just have a fucking chat it'd be awful!
You are reading a single comment by @hugo7 and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
hugo7
Did you watch Rise and Fall on Channel 4 last year? (still on All 4 or whatever its called today). I honestly think it was waaay more entertaining than The Traitors.
This second series lot of Traitors are so fucking dumb, how can they not understand voting for each other makes them individually more vulnerable to being sussed out?!