Hypothetically what's the difference in terms of copyright between training an AI on high-quality journalism and training a human writer on high-quality journalism and asking them to emulate it? If I look at a lot of Turner paintings and then do my own painting which is Turner-inspired, that's clearly not copyright infringement, so it will be interesting to see where that line is drawn.
Seems more like they want to stop content-generating "AI" out of self-preservation (same with Getty) than this being a legitimate infringement case.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/jan/08/ai-tools-chatgpt-copyrighted-material-openai
This is interesting.
Hypothetically what's the difference in terms of copyright between training an AI on high-quality journalism and training a human writer on high-quality journalism and asking them to emulate it? If I look at a lot of Turner paintings and then do my own painting which is Turner-inspired, that's clearly not copyright infringement, so it will be interesting to see where that line is drawn.
Seems more like they want to stop content-generating "AI" out of self-preservation (same with Getty) than this being a legitimate infringement case.