I hate it when you are reading a book and it utterly aligns with your worldview and it makes a really strong argument for what you believe. Then as part of the evidence to back up this emphatic position, the author strays into your own niche area of expertise and they get something fundamental completely wrong & then you wonder how many other fuck ups are there in their hypothesis?
I hate it when you are reading a book and it utterly aligns with your worldview and it makes a really strong argument for what you believe. Then as part of the evidence to back up this emphatic position, the author strays into your own niche area of expertise and they get something fundamental completely wrong & then you wonder how many other fuck ups are there in their hypothesis?